The author of "The Path to 9/11" states, "9/ll is sacred...," But he also says that "The following dramatization...has composite and representative characters and incidents, and time compressions have been used for dramatic purposes." Let's just skip past how depicting an event that never happened can somehow be a "compression used for dramatic purposes" and go straight to how this statement is prefaced:
"we say so upfront in a long legend -- 'The following dramatization...has composite and representative characters and incidents, and time compressions have been used for dramatic purposes.'So the author is in effect stating that if he crosses his fingers behind his back then it is OK to lie. It is the viewers fault! they didn't read the "long legend!" So when Disney/ABC passes this around to the schools for free and the children don't read the "long legend," it will be their fault too! Disney/ABC is saying in effect, "If you misunderstand that we are not telling the truth, it's your own fault for not reading the disclaimer!" what kind of fool would listen to such a weak rationialization?
More floaters in the Disney/ABC punchbowl
Major Washington Post story on Disney/ABC scandal, exposes two additional
major errors in 9/11 depiction
Clinton Administration Officials Assail ABC's 'The Path to 9/11'
Top Bush Counterterrorism Official: ABC’s Path to 9/11 Is ‘Shameful,’
‘Straight Out of Disney and Fantasyland’
Open Letter to ABC: Don't Airbrush 9/11
Ben-Veniste rips ABC’s fakeumentary over inaccuracies
Kean Sr.'s 9/11 Sell Out
Kean Let 9/11 Movie Fabrications Slide
The Path to 9/11 Blog
|"I weep for you," the Walrus said:|
"I deeply sympathize."
With sobs and tears he sorted out
Those of the largest size,
Holding his pocket-handkerchief
Before his streaming eyes.