Minister of Science and Chief Protector of the Faith

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Indecision '08

 
The bad news is that the Democrats can't decide on a candidate...

The good news is that the Republicans can't either!
 

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

13 Comments:

At Wed May 07, 11:27:00 AM, Blogger Swinebread said...

But Obama isn't electable because he's black... or half-black...

that's what they keep telling me on the news anyway

 
At Wed May 07, 12:12:00 PM, Blogger Dean Wormer said...

Republicans have a candidate too?

Huh.

 
At Wed May 07, 01:17:00 PM, Blogger Liberality said...

And look at the total votes for each party! Now that is some great news.

 
At Wed May 07, 02:02:00 PM, Blogger mwb said...

Yup as I've said before a significant number of Republicans are still coming out just to vote against McCain - which is awesome.

 
At Wed May 07, 02:50:00 PM, Blogger Dr. Monkey Von Monkerstein said...

Liberality is right, look how motivated the Democrats are.

 
At Thu May 08, 04:07:00 AM, Blogger Distributorcap said...

i wonder how the mccain people would explain this -- but aaah, the MSM would never bother to ask this one

 
At Thu May 08, 10:27:00 AM, Blogger Comet Rider said...

According to these precise numbers (very nice table), this nation will be leaderless starting in January 2009. Good news for the planet.

 
At Thu May 08, 02:06:00 PM, Blogger Spirula said...

this nation will be leaderless starting in January 2009

We have a leader?

 
At Thu May 08, 02:44:00 PM, Blogger Freida Bee said...

Spirula- Do you mean... Dr. Zauis?

 
At Thu May 08, 05:00:00 PM, OpenID duros62 said...

You left off the best part.

Alan Keyes got 3% in NC, right behind "Who gives a fuck"

 
At Fri May 09, 03:34:00 PM, Blogger Mauigirl said...

Looks to me like about a quarter of Republicans don't want McCain. Will they stay home on election day? Hopefully - or vote for Obama!

 
At Sun May 11, 10:40:00 AM, Blogger chaos4700 said...

this nation will be leaderless starting in January 2009. Good news for the planet.

Considering what we've done to the world with the sort of leaders we've had, on average, since the 80's -- Reagan (Iran/Contra, Panama), Bush the "Greater" (Iraq phase 1) and Bush the Lesser (Afghanistan, Iraq and any country that shares a border with Israel or our favored trade partner, China) -- we'd probably be doing the world a favor if we went leaderless for a while. I'm actually starting to wonder if anarchy really would be worse than what we have going on now. At least you can actually move forward from anarchy.

 
At Tue May 13, 10:25:00 AM, Blogger Dr. Zaius said...

Swinebread: He is either too black or not black enough, depending on the TV show. Drat!

Dean Wormer: Yeah... What is that guy's name, anyway?

Liberality: That does look good!

MWB: Democrats aren't the only party in turmoil. If only the media covered that story!

Dr. Monkerstein: Yep! At least there is some good news...

Distributorcap: Yep. Remember, the media is McCain's "base".

Comet Rider: I stole the tables from Crooks and Liars! And then made them into a graphic.

Spirula: It can't be worse than what we have now!

Freida Bee: Yay! Of course, I am the only logical choice.

duros62: Ha! I missed that bit about Alan Keyes!

Mauigirl: Yay! I hope that you are right! :o)

chaos4700: When man has lost all of his leaders, he will learn who is the true master of this house - an ape!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

 
Newer Posts  |  Older Posts